Barack Obama received his Nobel peace prize just days after announcing his decision to escalate the war in Afghanistan.

Obama started off his acceptance speech with a lengthy dissertation on the history of war and peace. However Obama’s words seemed to tie together two polar opposite concepts, war and peace.

How can you be at peace, while being at war.

He spent a great amount of effort defending the US wars, and making sure that people knew that OUR WARS were justified.

Barack Obama is a master of George Orwell’s “doublethink”.

Doublethink is a word described in the fictional language of Newspeak and the act of simultaneously accepting as correct two mutually contradictory beliefs.

We will seek peace, by going to war.

We will end the war, by sending more troops.

We will reduce the budget, by spending more money.

Obama’s adept use of the English language paints beautiful imagery around his contradictory ideals. An average person will accept what he says as fact, because he can so easily create confusion and eloquence at the same time.

To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which canceled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget, whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again, and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself — that was the ultimate subtlety; consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word ‘doublethink’ involved the use of doublethink.

-1984

Review the audience at any of Barack Obamas recent speeches. Without doubt the people sit in their chairs with blank stares on their face, because their minds does not know what to think. His words neither challenge you to think, as he never takes a firm position one way or the other, nor do they ever please you, as he argues both sides expertly. However he has the ability of inducing a hypnotic trance with his carefully crafted wording. The power to believe in two opposing lies and to use logic and against his own logic.

Do not be fooled, his words are always carefully chosen. He chooses to name leaders from each party, he chooses role models from every race and creed. People on every side of every issue. All in an effort to gain your confidence. Ghandi and the Soviet Union. Ronald Reagan and labor party leaders. JFK and “An Sang Ku Chi”. Martin Luther King and then Mao in the next sentence. Surely if he can draw connections between two opposing figures then he can draw consensus among two opposing ideas.

“I understand why war is not popular, but the belief that peace is desirable is rarely enough to achieve it”

Because Obama has no intention of ending perpetual war, he must convince you that for peace there must be war.

“Thats why we honor those who return home from peace keeping, we honor them not as makers of war, but as wagers of peace.”

“Clear eyed we can understand that there will be war and still strive for peace”

Obama’s Exercise In Hypocrisy

I understand why war is not popular, but the belief that peace is desirable is rarely enough to achieve it

The words of the international community must mean something.

Those regimes that break the rules must be held accountable.

Sanctions must exact a real price.

Intransigence must be met with real pressure.

That pressure exists only when the world stands together as one.

There must be consequences

Yes there will be engagement

Yes there will be diplomacy

But there must be consequences.

Sanctions are an act of war. What hypocrisy to decry your enemies with threats of sanctions are war during the acceptance of the worlds highest award for peace.

Obama continued on seemingly to tell stories of other nations struggles, but in fact did more to detail the hypocrisy that runs rampant throughout the United States.

“Some where today in this world

A young protester awaits the brutality of her government

But has the courage to march on.

I believe that peace is unstable

Where citizens are denied the right to speak freely

Or the right to worship as they please.

Choose their own leaders or assemble without fear.

Pent up greivances fester

And the oppresion of religiuos identity can lead to violence.”

The protester Obama is referring to was a university of Pittsburgh student who was standing outside her dormitory on the night of the G20.

The place were citizens are denied the right to speak freely is right outside my front door. I have not chosen a single person who works in Washington dc, nor has any of Obama’s czars been elected by a vote determined by the citizens.

If we assemble peacefully we will surely face police brutality, tasers, and tear gas, and then we will be put on secretive government lists. No one to stand witness either for or against you, you do not have the right to face your accuser. You’re either on the list or your not on the list. Once you are on it, there is justification to remove from you all rights that have been endowed by your government. That list however is not open to the public scrutiny.

The oppression of religious identity is underway every single day, because we are no longer a Christian nation, Christians are denied the right to practice any form of religion in public.

The pent up grievances of the American people have been festering for a long time. Taxes, fines, regulations, and registrations, have become a burden on the will of the people.

Our grievances will continue to fester until our “President” stops being the President of the World, and starts being the President of America.