<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Liberty Guardian &#187; coca-cola</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelibertyguardian.com/tag/coca-cola/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelibertyguardian.com</link>
	<description>Liberty and Justice for All</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:45:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Carmel Color Additive in Coca-Cola May Cause Cancer: Activist Call FDA To Ban</title>
		<link>http://thelibertyguardian.com/2011/02/carmel-color-additive-in-coca-cola-may-cause-cancer-activist-call-fda-to-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://thelibertyguardian.com/2011/02/carmel-color-additive-in-coca-cola-may-cause-cancer-activist-call-fda-to-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M.J. Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coca-cola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food coloring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelibertyguardian.com/?p=2146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The caramel colouring used in Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and other foods is contaminated with two cancer-causing chemicals and should be banned,’]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1357787/Coca-cola-Pepsi-ingredient-cancer-risk-Call-ban-colouring-agent.html#ixzz1EKjZPP00">Daily Mail</a>) An ingredient used in Coca-Cola and Pepsi is a cancer risk and should be banned, an influential lobby group has claimed.</p>
<p>The concerns relate to an artificial brown colouring agent that the researchers say could be causing thousands of cancers.</p>
<p>‘The caramel colouring used in Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and other foods is contaminated with two cancer-causing chemicals and should be banned,’ said the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), a health lobby group based in Washington, DC.</p>
<p>‘In contrast to the caramel one might make at home by melting sugar in a saucepan, the artificial brown colouring in colas and some other products is made by reacting sugars with ammonia and sulphites under high pressure and temperatures.</p>
<p>‘Chemical reactions result in the formation of two substances known as 2-MI and 4-MI which in government-conducted studies caused lung, liver, or thyroid cancer or leukaemia in laboratory mice or rats.’</p>
<p>America’s National Toxicology Program says that there is ‘clear evidence’ that both 2-MI and 4-MI are animal carcinogens, and therefore likely to pose a risk to humans.</p>
<p>Researchers at the University of California, Davis, found significant levels of 4-MI in five brands of cola.</p>
<p>The executive director of the CSPI, Michael F Jacobson, has petitioned America’s food regulator, the Food &#038; Drug Administration, to take action.He said: ‘Carcinogenic colourings have no place in the food supply, especially considering that their only function is a cosmetic one.’</p>
<p>Mr Jacobson said the name ‘caramel colouring’ does not accurately describe the additives, explaining: ‘It’s a concentrated dark brown mixture of chemicals that simply does not occur in nature.’</p>
<p>He added that while regular caramel could not be described as healthy, ‘at least it is not tainted with carcinogens’.</p>
<p>U.S. regulations distinguish between four types of caramel colouring, two of which are produced with ammonia and two without it. The CSPI wants the two made with ammonia to be banned and has received backing from five prominent cancer experts, including several who have worked at the National Toxicology Program.</p>
<p>The type used in colas and other dark soft drinks is known as Caramel IV, or ammonia sulphite process caramel. Caramel III, which is produced with ammonia but not sulphites, is sometimes used in beer, soy sauce, and other foods.</p>
<p>The CSPI admitted that any risk associated with consumption of the chemicals would be extremely small. It said the ten teaspoons of sugar found in a can of regular cola would be more of a health problem.</p>
<p>However, it argued the levels of 4-MI in the tested colas still may be causing thousands of cancers in the U.S. population alone.</p>
<p>Earlier this week, it was claimed that Coca-Cola’s secret recipe had been leaked. It was even suggested it might be possible to recreate the taste and look on the kitchen table.</p>
<p>The leak claims were denied by the company, where a spokesman said: ‘Many third parties have tried to crack our secret formula. Try as they might, they’ve been unsuccessful because there is only one “Real Thing”.’</p>
<p>Coca-Cola and Pepsi did not respond to a request for a response to the CSPI claims.</p>
<p>This morning Coca-Cola rejected the CSPI’s concerns.</p>
<p>A spokesman said: ‘Our beverages are completely safe. CSPI’s statement irresponsibly insinuates that the caramel used in our beverages is unsafe and<br />
maliciously raises cancer concerns among consumers.</p>
<p>&#8216;This does a disservice to the very public for which CSPI purports to serve.</p>
<p>‘Studies show that the caramel we use does not cause cancer.’</p>
<p>The company said its drinks do not contain 2-MEI. It said they do contain 4-MEI in trace amounts.</p>
<p>It said: ‘These extrapolations by CSPI to human health and cancer are totally unfounded.’</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelibertyguardian.com/2011/02/carmel-color-additive-in-coca-cola-may-cause-cancer-activist-call-fda-to-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Un-Painted Coke Cans Saving Earth One Can at a Time</title>
		<link>http://thelibertyguardian.com/2009/11/un-painted-coke-cans-saving-earth-one-can-at-a-time/</link>
		<comments>http://thelibertyguardian.com/2009/11/un-painted-coke-cans-saving-earth-one-can-at-a-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M.J. Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coca-cola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelibertyguardian.com/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The naked can help to reduce air and water pollution occurred in its coloring process]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t only look beautiful, and it would make Jon Ive and Steve Jobs wet, but this naked Coca-Cola can would help save energy while reducing air and water pollution. Would it really make a difference? Let&#8217;s do some math:</p>
<p>I assume the consumption only increases through time, but let&#8217;s take the daily 2007 numbers from Global INForM Cases Sales database: The total number of Coca-Cola cans sold per worldwide is 67,873,309. Diet Coke and Coke Zero sold 35,387,241, while My Coke sold 103,260,550. Yes, that&#8217;s all per day.</p>
<p>So using only classic Coca-Cola&#8217;s daily sales figures, that means 24,773,757,785 are sold every year. Twenty-four billion cans. That is indeed a lot of paint and paint removal products. Because this doesn&#8217;t only affect the production. It also affects the recycling process, eliminating one step:</p>
<blockquote><p>  The naked can help to reduce air and water pollution occurred in its coloring process. It also reduces energy and effort to separate toxic color paint from aluminum in recycling process. Huge amount of energy and paint required to manufacture colored cans will be saved. Instead of toxic paint, manufacturers process aluminum with a pressing machine that indicates brand identity on surface.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sounds good to me, and it even looks better if you take into account all kinds of Coke. That brings up the number to 75,380,201,500 cans. I don&#8217;t know how much paint that represents, but I&#8217;m guessing quite a few thousand tons. </p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5408251/the-paint+less-coca+cola-would-save-earth-one-can-at-a-time">Gizmodo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelibertyguardian.com/2009/11/un-painted-coke-cans-saving-earth-one-can-at-a-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Entrepreneurs: The Soda Pop King</title>
		<link>http://thelibertyguardian.com/2009/11/american-entrepreneurs-the-soda-pop-king/</link>
		<comments>http://thelibertyguardian.com/2009/11/american-entrepreneurs-the-soda-pop-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M.J. Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coca-cola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pepsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solda pop king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelibertyguardian.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Classic Glass Bottles, No High-Fructose Corn Syrup, and over 500 Varieties John Nese rejects the Big Chains and prefers to do business with people the same size]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gPbh6Ru7VVM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gPbh6Ru7VVM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p>John Nese is the owner of Galcos Soda Pop Stop in LA. His father ran it as a grocery store, and when the time came for John to take charge, he decided to convert it into the ultimate soda-lovers destination. Over 500 pops line the shelves, sourced lovingly by John from around the world. </p>
<p>John has made it his mission to keep small soda-makers afloat and help them find their constomers. Galcos also acts as a distributor for restaurants and bars along the West Coast, spreading the gospel of soda made with cane sugar (no high-fructose corn syrup if John can avoid it). </p>
<p>He has turned away big corporations like PepsiCo from his store many times.  Telling them his customers could simply get a better deal if they went down the street where its usually on sale.  When the Pepisco rep said &#8220;You can&#8217;t do that, your customers will demand that you carry Pepsi.&#8221;  John reminded himself.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;I own my shelf space and I can do what I want.&#8221;</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelibertyguardian.com/2009/11/american-entrepreneurs-the-soda-pop-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

